| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 13:14:37 +0800 From: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@...il.com> To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix perf-lock report coredump On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:20 AM, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote: > On 7/10/12 7:06 PM, Jovi Zhang wrote: >> >> From 4b363bf16c12b76788fbace1475123b7214ae58d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@...il.com> >> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 16:53:57 +0800 >> Subject: [PATCH] perf: fix perf-lock report coredump >> >> Check sample type event raw_data is existed in perf.data firstly, >> then invoke process_raw_event, otherwise it will coredump. > > > Does this fix it for you: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/6/405 > Yeah, same problem. But the question is if there have some sample event with raw data in perf.data, are we still just exit(1)? or let perf-lock only report those sample events with raw data? > Also does 'perf lock record' work for you? If so can you send me your kernel > config file? Not working. I assume LOCKDEP is not configured in my test machine. > > Thanks, > > David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists