linux-kernel - Re: 3.4.4-rt13: btrfs + xfstests 006 = BOOM.. and a bonus rt_mutex deadlock report for absolutely free!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:53:12 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	"linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: 3.4.4-rt13: btrfs + xfstests 006 = BOOM..  and a bonus rt_mutex
 deadlock report for absolutely free!

On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 10:44 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: 
> On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 07:47 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: 
> > Greetings,
> > 
> > I'm chasing btrfs critters in an enterprise 3.0-rt kernel, and just
> > checked to see if they're alive in virgin latest/greatest rt kernel.  
> > 
> > Both are indeed alive and well, ie I didn't break it, nor did the
> > zillion patches in enterprise base kernel, so others may have an
> > opportunity to meet these critters up close and personal as well.
> 
> 3.2-rt both explodes and deadlocks as well.  3.0-rt (virgin I mean) does
> neither, so with enough re-integrate investment, it might be bisectable.

Nope, virgin 3.0-rt just didn't feel like it at the time.  Booted it
again to run hefty test over lunch, it didn't survive 1 xfstests 006,
much less hundreds.

crash> bt
PID: 7604   TASK: ffff880174238b20  CPU: 0   COMMAND: "btrfs-worker-0"
 #0 [ffff88017455d9c8] machine_kexec at ffffffff81025794
 #1 [ffff88017455da28] crash_kexec at ffffffff8109781d
 #2 [ffff88017455daf8] panic at ffffffff814a0661
 #3 [ffff88017455db78] __try_to_take_rt_mutex at ffffffff81086d2f
 #4 [ffff88017455dbc8] rt_spin_lock_slowlock at ffffffff814a2670
 #5 [ffff88017455dca8] rt_spin_lock at ffffffff814a2db9
 #6 [ffff88017455dcb8] schedule_bio at ffffffff81243133
 #7 [ffff88017455dcf8] btrfs_map_bio at ffffffff812477be
 #8 [ffff88017455dd68] __btree_submit_bio_done at ffffffff812152f6
 #9 [ffff88017455dd78] run_one_async_done at ffffffff812148fa
#10 [ffff88017455dd98] run_ordered_completions at ffffffff812493e8
#11 [ffff88017455ddd8] worker_loop at ffffffff81249dc9
#12 [ffff88017455de88] kthread at ffffffff81070266
#13 [ffff88017455df48] kernel_thread_helper at ffffffff814a9be4
crash> struct rt_mutex 0xffff880174530108
struct rt_mutex {
  wait_lock = {
    raw_lock = {
      slock = 7966
    }
  }, 
  wait_list = {
    node_list = {
      next = 0xffff880175ecc970, 
      prev = 0xffff880175ecc970
    }, 
    rawlock = 0xffff880175ecc968, 
    spinlock = 0x0
  }, 
  owner = 0x1, 
  save_state = 0, 
  file = 0x0, 
  name = 0xffffffff81763d02 "&(&device->io_lock)->lock", 
  line = 0, 
  magic = 0x0
}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/