linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:24:47 -0700
From:	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	joshhunt00@...il.com, axboe@...nel.dk, rni@...gle.com,
	vgoyal@...hat.com, vwadekar@...dia.com,
	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, swhiteho@...hat.com, bpm@....com,
	elder@...nel.org, xfs@....sgi.com, marcel@...tmann.org,
	gustavo@...ovan.org, johan.hedberg@...il.com,
	linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, martin.petersen@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: reimplement WQ_HIGHPRI using a separate worker_pool

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> Can you please try the following debug patch instead?  Yours is
> different from Fengguang's.

New dmesg from mext-20120712 + this new patch (instead of previous one)

[Note - I see some XXX traces, but no WARN_ON stack dump this time]

-Tony

View attachment "dmesg.txt" of type "text/plain" (22303 bytes)