lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 15 Jul 2012 11:05:05 +0300
From:	Maya Erez <merez@...eaurora.org>
To:	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Maya Erez <merez@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org (open list:DOCUMENTATION),
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH v5] mmc: block: Add write packing control

The write packing control will ensure that read requests latency is
not increased due to long write packed commands.

The trigger for enabling the write packing is managing to pack several
write requests. The number of potential packed requests that will trigger
the packing can be configured via sysfs by writing the required value to:
/sys/block/<block_dev_name>/num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing.
The trigger for disabling the write packing is fetching a read request.

Signed-off-by: Maya Erez <merez@...eaurora.org>
---
Our experiments showed that the write packing causes degradation of the read
throughput, in parallel read and write operations.
Since the read latency is critical for user experience we added a write packing control
mechanism that disables the write packing in case of read requests.
This will ensure that read requests latency is not increased due to long write packed commands.

The trigger for enabling the write packing is managing to pack several write requests.
The number of potential packed requests that will trigger the packing can be configured via sysfs.
The trigger for disabling the write packing is a fetch of a read request.

Changes in v5:
    - Revert v4 changes
    - fix the device attribute removal in case of failure of device_create_file

Changes in v4:
    - Move MMC specific attributes to mmc sub-directory

Changes in v3:
    - Fix the settings of num_of_potential_packed_wr_reqs

Changes in v2:
    - Move the attribute for setting the packing enabling trigger to the block device
    - Add documentation of the new attribute
---
 Documentation/mmc/mmc-dev-attrs.txt |   17 ++++++
 drivers/mmc/card/block.c            |  104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/mmc/card/queue.c            |    8 +++
 drivers/mmc/card/queue.h            |    3 +
 include/linux/mmc/host.h            |    1 +
 5 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/mmc/mmc-dev-attrs.txt b/Documentation/mmc/mmc-dev-attrs.txt
index 22ae844..08f7312 100644
--- a/Documentation/mmc/mmc-dev-attrs.txt
+++ b/Documentation/mmc/mmc-dev-attrs.txt
@@ -8,6 +8,23 @@ The following attributes are read/write.
 
 	force_ro		Enforce read-only access even if write protect switch is off.
 
+	num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing 	This attribute is used to determine
+	the trigger for activating the write packing, in case the write
+	packing control feature is enabled.
+
+	When the MMC manages to reach a point where num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing
+	write requests could be packed, it enables the write packing feature.
+	This allows us to start the write packing only when it is beneficial
+	and has minimum affect on the read latency.
+
+	The number of potential packed requests that will trigger the packing
+	can be configured via sysfs by writing the required value to:
+	/sys/block/<block_dev_name>/num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing.
+
+	The default value of num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing was determined by
+	running parallel lmdd write and lmdd read operations and calculating
+	the max number of packed writes requests.
+
 SD and MMC Device Attributes
 ============================
 
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
index 4ba0f09..73e26f3 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ struct mmc_blk_data {
 	struct device_attribute force_ro;
 	struct device_attribute power_ro_lock;
 	int	area_type;
+	struct device_attribute num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing;
 };
 
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(open_lock);
@@ -281,6 +282,38 @@ out:
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static ssize_t
+num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing_show(struct device *dev,
+				  struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+	struct mmc_blk_data *md = mmc_blk_get(dev_to_disk(dev));
+	int num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing;
+	int ret;
+
+	num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing = md->queue.num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing;
+
+	ret = snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing);
+
+	mmc_blk_put(md);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static ssize_t
+num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing_store(struct device *dev,
+				 struct device_attribute *attr,
+				 const char *buf, size_t count)
+{
+	int value;
+	struct mmc_blk_data *md = mmc_blk_get(dev_to_disk(dev));
+
+	sscanf(buf, "%d", &value);
+	if (value >= 0)
+		md->queue.num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing = value;
+
+	mmc_blk_put(md);
+	return count;
+}
+
 static int mmc_blk_open(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode)
 {
 	struct mmc_blk_data *md = mmc_blk_get(bdev->bd_disk);
@@ -1296,6 +1329,49 @@ static void mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq,
 	mmc_queue_bounce_pre(mqrq);
 }
 
+static void mmc_blk_write_packing_control(struct mmc_queue *mq,
+					  struct request *req)
+{
+	struct mmc_host *host = mq->card->host;
+	int data_dir;
+
+	if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_PACKED_WR))
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * In case the packing control is not supported by the host, it should
+	 * not have an effect on the write packing. Therefore we have to enable
+	 * the write packing
+	 */
+	if (!(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_PACKED_WR_CONTROL)) {
+		mq->wr_packing_enabled = true;
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (!req || (req && (req->cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH))) {
+		if (mq->num_of_potential_packed_wr_reqs >
+				mq->num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing)
+			mq->wr_packing_enabled = true;
+		mq->num_of_potential_packed_wr_reqs = 0;
+		return;
+	}
+
+	data_dir = rq_data_dir(req);
+
+	if (data_dir == READ) {
+		mq->num_of_potential_packed_wr_reqs = 0;
+		mq->wr_packing_enabled = false;
+		return;
+	} else if (data_dir == WRITE) {
+		mq->num_of_potential_packed_wr_reqs++;
+	}
+
+	if (mq->num_of_potential_packed_wr_reqs >
+			mq->num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing)
+		mq->wr_packing_enabled = true;
+
+}
+
 static u8 mmc_blk_prep_packed_list(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
 {
 	struct request_queue *q = mq->queue;
@@ -1314,6 +1390,9 @@ static u8 mmc_blk_prep_packed_list(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
 	if (!(md->flags & MMC_BLK_CMD23) || !card->ext_csd.packed_event_en)
 		goto no_packed;
 
+	if (!mq->wr_packing_enabled)
+		goto no_packed;
+
 	if ((rq_data_dir(cur) == WRITE) &&
 	    (card->host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_PACKED_WR))
 		max_packed_rw = card->ext_csd.max_packed_writes;
@@ -1384,6 +1463,8 @@ static u8 mmc_blk_prep_packed_list(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
 			break;
 		}
 
+		if (rq_data_dir(next) == WRITE)
+			mq->num_of_potential_packed_wr_reqs++;
 		list_add_tail(&next->queuelist, &mq->mqrq_cur->packed_list);
 		cur = next;
 		reqs++;
@@ -1768,6 +1849,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	mmc_blk_write_packing_control(mq, req);
+
 	if (req && req->cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD) {
 		/* complete ongoing async transfer before issuing discard */
 		if (card->host->areq)
@@ -2004,6 +2087,8 @@ static void mmc_blk_remove_req(struct mmc_blk_data *md)
 					card->ext_csd.boot_ro_lockable)
 				device_remove_file(disk_to_dev(md->disk),
 					&md->power_ro_lock);
+			device_remove_file(disk_to_dev(md->disk),
+					   &md->num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing);
 
 			/* Stop new requests from getting into the queue */
 			del_gendisk(md->disk);
@@ -2064,8 +2149,27 @@ static int mmc_add_disk(struct mmc_blk_data *md)
 		if (ret)
 			goto power_ro_lock_fail;
 	}
+
+	md->num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing.show =
+		num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing_show;
+	md->num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing.store =
+		num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing_store;
+	sysfs_attr_init(&md->num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing.attr);
+	md->num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing.attr.name =
+		"num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing";
+	md->num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing.attr.mode = S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR;
+	ret = device_create_file(disk_to_dev(md->disk),
+				 &md->num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing);
+	if (ret)
+		goto num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing_fail;
+
 	return ret;
 
+num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing_fail:
+	if ((md->area_type & MMC_BLK_DATA_AREA_BOOT) &&
+	     card->ext_csd.boot_ro_lockable)
+		device_remove_file(disk_to_dev(md->disk),
+				   &md->power_ro_lock);
 power_ro_lock_fail:
 	device_remove_file(disk_to_dev(md->disk), &md->force_ro);
 force_ro_fail:
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
index 230bad3..91036c1 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
@@ -25,6 +25,13 @@
 #define MMC_QUEUE_SUSPENDED	(1 << 0)
 
 /*
+ * Based on benchmark tests the default num of requests to trigger the write
+ * packing was determined, to keep the read latency as low as possible and
+ * manage to keep the high write throughput.
+ */
+#define DEFAULT_NUM_REQS_TO_START_PACK 17
+
+/*
  * Prepare a MMC request. This just filters out odd stuff.
  */
 static int mmc_prep_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req)
@@ -181,6 +188,7 @@ int mmc_init_queue(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct mmc_card *card,
 	mq->mqrq_cur = mqrq_cur;
 	mq->mqrq_prev = mqrq_prev;
 	mq->queue->queuedata = mq;
+	mq->num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing = DEFAULT_NUM_REQS_TO_START_PACK;
 
 	blk_queue_prep_rq(mq->queue, mmc_prep_request);
 	queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT, mq->queue);
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h
index 5e04938..93e4b59 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h
+++ b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h
@@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ struct mmc_queue {
 	struct mmc_queue_req	mqrq[2];
 	struct mmc_queue_req	*mqrq_cur;
 	struct mmc_queue_req	*mqrq_prev;
+	bool			wr_packing_enabled;
+	int			num_of_potential_packed_wr_reqs;
+	int			num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing;
 };
 
 extern int mmc_init_queue(struct mmc_queue *, struct mmc_card *, spinlock_t *,
diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
index 79d8921..f9a5917 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
@@ -273,6 +273,7 @@ struct mmc_host {
 #define MMC_CAP2_PACKED_WR	    (1 << 21)	/* Allow packed write */
 #define MMC_CAP2_PACKED_CMD	(MMC_CAP2_PACKED_RD | \
 				 MMC_CAP2_PACKED_WR) /* Allow packed commands */
+#define MMC_CAP2_PACKED_WR_CONTROL (1 << 22) /* Allow write packing control */
 
 	mmc_pm_flag_t		pm_caps;	/* supported pm features */
 	unsigned int        power_notify_type;
-- 
1.7.3.3
-- 
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists