| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 09:16:37 +0200 From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> To: Piotr Sawuk <a9702387@...t.univie.ac.at> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: resurrecting tcphealth On Sun, 2012-07-15 at 01:43 +0200, Piotr Sawuk wrote: > oh, and again I recommend the really short although outdated thesis > > [1] https://sacerdoti.org/tcphealth/tcphealth-paper.pdf A thesis saying SACK are not useful is highly suspect. Instead of finding why they behave not so good and fix the bugs, just say "SACK addition to TCP is not critical" Really ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists