lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:46:13 +0000
From:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
To:	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, markgross@...gnar.org,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, mtk@....net
Subject: Re: [patch] Rename CAP_EPOLLWAKEUP to CAL_BLOCK_SUSPEND

Quoting Michael Kerrisk (mtk.manpages@...il.com):
> Rafael,
> 
> As discussed in
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1249726/focus=1288990,
> the capability introduced in 4d7e30d98939a0340022ccd49325a3d70f7e0238
> to govern EPOLLWAKEUP seems misnamed: this capability is about governing
> the ability to suspend the system, not using a particular API flag
> (EPOLLWAKEUP). We should make the name of the capability more general
> to encourage reuse in related cases. (Whether or not this capability
> should also be used to govern the use of /sys/power/wake_lock is a
> question that needs to be separately resolved.)
> 
> This patch renames the capability to CAP_BLOCK_SUSPEND. In order to ensure
> that the old capability name doesn't make it out into the wild, could you
> please apply and push up the tree to ensure that it is incorporated
> for the 3.5 release.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Michael
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>

I definately like that name better, thanks.  Don't know if renaming it
without an alias could cause trouble for some bleeding edge userspaces?
Would it be worth keeping the 

#define CAP_EPOLLWAKEUP      36

line?  If this is deemed early enough I do prefer not to complicate with
a duplicate name.

Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>

> 
> ---
>  fs/eventpoll.c             |    2 +-
>  include/linux/capability.h |    6 +++---
>  include/linux/eventpoll.h  |    2 +-
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
> index 74598f6..1c8b556 100644
> --- a/fs/eventpoll.c
> +++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
> @@ -1710,7 +1710,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(epoll_ctl, int, epfd, int, op, int, fd,
>  		goto error_tgt_fput;
>  
>  	/* Check if EPOLLWAKEUP is allowed */
> -	if ((epds.events & EPOLLWAKEUP) && !capable(CAP_EPOLLWAKEUP))
> +	if ((epds.events & EPOLLWAKEUP) && !capable(CAP_BLOCK_SUSPEND))
>  		epds.events &= ~EPOLLWAKEUP;
>  
>  	/*
> diff --git a/include/linux/capability.h b/include/linux/capability.h
> index 68d56ef..d10b7ed 100644
> --- a/include/linux/capability.h
> +++ b/include/linux/capability.h
> @@ -360,11 +360,11 @@ struct cpu_vfs_cap_data {
>  
>  #define CAP_WAKE_ALARM            35
>  
> -/* Allow preventing system suspends while epoll events are pending */
> +/* Allow preventing system suspends */
>  
> -#define CAP_EPOLLWAKEUP      36
> +#define CAP_BLOCK_SUSPEND    36
>  
> -#define CAP_LAST_CAP         CAP_EPOLLWAKEUP
> +#define CAP_LAST_CAP         CAP_BLOCK_SUSPEND
>  
>  #define cap_valid(x) ((x) >= 0 && (x) <= CAP_LAST_CAP)
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/eventpoll.h b/include/linux/eventpoll.h
> index 6f8be32..f4bb378 100644
> --- a/include/linux/eventpoll.h
> +++ b/include/linux/eventpoll.h
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
>   * re-allowed until epoll_wait is called again after consuming the wakeup
>   * event(s).
>   *
> - * Requires CAP_EPOLLWAKEUP
> + * Requires CAP_BLOCK_SUSPEND
>   */
>  #define EPOLLWAKEUP (1 << 29)
>  
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ