lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:22:52 +0530
From:	"Mahapatra, Chandrabhanu" <cmahapatra@...com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	grant.likely@...retlab.ca, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
	rob.herring@...xeda.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, leed.aguilar@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] gpio/pca953x: register the device irq using
 appropriate api's

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
> <cmahapatra@...com> wrote:
>
>> From: Leed Aguilar <leed.aguilar@...com>
>>
>> Here, the implementation of registration of requested IRQs has been corrected
>> with appropiate api's. The gpio number is requested through gpio_request_one()
>> API and conversion of the gpio to irq is done using the gpio_to_irq() API.
>>
>> Change-Id: I964145e2a280d6553ea2c05ea8049810a1983930
>
> Delete that.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Leed Aguilar <leed.aguilar@...com>
>> Signed-off-by: Chandrabhanu Mahapatra <cmahapatra@...com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c |    8 +++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
>> index c3ca7d8..27486da 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
>> @@ -509,7 +509,13 @@ static int pca953x_irq_setup(struct pca953x_chip *chip,
>>  #endif
>>                 }
>>
>> -               ret = request_threaded_irq(client->irq,
>> +               ret = gpio_request_one(client->irq, GPIOF_IN, "pca953x");
>
> Not that it's really related to this one patch, but why is a GPIO number named
> "irq" in client->irq??

Sorry, for the late reply. You need not pull this patch. There has
been some slight miss understanding and as it turns out the
gpio_request_one() should actually be done in the board file with the
appropriate gpio number. This gpio number should be converted to irq
in the board file and then finally sent as client->irq to pca953x
driver. Please undo this patch.


-- 
Chandrabhanu Mahapatra
Texas Instruments India Pvt. Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ