linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Staging: slicoss: Clean up spaces vs tabs in slicoss.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:22:40 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	Christopher Harrer <charrer@...critech.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lior Dotan <liodot@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Staging: slicoss: Clean up spaces vs tabs in
 slicoss.c

On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 10:57:20PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static void slic_assert_fail(void)
>  	curr_pid = current->pid;
>  
>  	printk(KERN_ERR "%s CPU # %d ---- PID # %d\n",
> -	       __func__, cpuid, curr_pid);
> +		__func__, cpuid, curr_pid);

The original was actually the correct way here, lining is up is
preferred.  I don't care about this one line, but just so you are
aware.

regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/