| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 05:54:49 -0700 From: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com> To: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Benjamin Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Ranjit Manomohan <ranjitm@...gle.com>, Nikhil Rao <ncrao@...gle.com>, jmc@...unc.edu, Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>, Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] LinSched for v3.3-rc7 On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > Is there any latest info about the linsched? > I've not seen any updates so I'm not sure whether it is in the status to > accept patches or still need some rebuilding? > Hey Michael, I'll happily take patches but I've been completely backlogged by internal work. Dhaval, was going to send me a 3.5 rebase; let me sync up with him to see if that needs any massaging and I'll republish. I will be out for about two weeks from this Friday; but there should be at least 2 pushes before LPC in August -- one before I go, and one when I return. This is one of the many things on my pre-offline todo-list :-( Thanks, - Paul > Regards, > Michael Wang > > On 03/15/2012 11:58 AM, Paul Turner wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> [ Take 2, gmail tried to a non text/plain component into the last email .. ] >> >> Quick start version: >> >> Available under linsched-alpha at: >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pjt/linsched.git .linsched >> >> NOTE: The branch history is still subject to some revision as I am >> still re-partitioning some of the patches. Once this is complete, I >> will promote linsched-alpha into a linsched branch at which point it >> will no longer be subject to history re-writes. >> >> After checking out the code: >> cd tools/linsched >> make >> cd tests >> ./run_tests.sh basic_tests >> << then try changing some scheduler parameters, e.g. sched_latency, >> and repeating >> >> >> (Note: The basic_tests are unit-tests, these are calibrated to the >> current scheduler tunables and should strictly be considered sanity >> tests. Please see the mcarlo-sim work for a more useful testing >> environment.) >> >> Extended version: >> >> First of all, apologies in the delay to posting this -- I know there's >> been a lot of interest. We made the choice to first rebase to v3.3 >> since there were fairly extensive changes, especially within the >> scheduler, that meant we had the opportunity to significantly clean up >> some of the LinSched code. (For example, previously we were >> processing kernel/sched* using awk as a Makefile step so that we could >> extract the necessary structure information without modifying >> sched.c!) While the code benefited greatly from this, there were >> several other changes that required fairly extensive modification in >> this process (and in the meanwhile the v3.1 version became less >> representative due to the extent of the above changes); which pushed >> things out much further than I would have liked. I suppose the moral >> of the story is always release early, and often. >> >> That said, I'm relatively happy with the current state of integration, >> there's certainly some specific areas that can still be greatly >> improved (in particular, the main simulator loop has not had as much >> attention paid as the LinSched<>Kernel interactions and there's a long >> list of TODOs that could be improved there), but things are now mated >> fairly cleanly through the use of a new LinSched architecture. This >> is a total re-write of almost all LinSched<>Kernel interactions versus >> the previous (2.6.35) version, and has allowed us to now carry almost >> zero modifications against the kernel source. It's both possible to >> develop/test in place, as well as being patch compatible. The >> remaining touch-points now total just 20 lines! Half of these are >> likely mergable, with the other 10 lines being more LinSched specific >> at this point in time, I've broken these down below: >> >> The total damage: >> include/linux/init.h | 6 ++++++ (linsched ugliness, >> unfortunately necessary until we boot-strap proper initcall support) >> include/linux/rcupdate.h | 3 +++ (only necessary to allow -O0 >> compilation which is extremely handy for analyzing the scheduler using >> gdb) >> kernel/pid.c | 4 ++++ (linsched ugliness, >> these can go eventually) >> kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +- (this is just the >> promotion of 1 structure and function from static state which weren't >> published in the sched/ re-factoring that we need from within the >> simulator) >> kernel/sched/stats.c | 2 +- >> kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 3 ++- (this fixes a time-dilation >> error due to rounding when our clock-source has ns-resolution, e.g. >> shift==1) >> 6 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> Summarized changes vs 2.6.35 (previous version): >> >> - The original LinSched (understandably) simplified many of the kernel >> interactions in order to make simulation easier. Unfortunately, this >> has serious side-effects on the accuracy of simulation. We've now >> introduced a large portion of this state, including: irq and soft-irq >> contexts (we now perform periodic load-balance out of SCHED_SOFTIRQ >> for example), support for active load-balancing, correctly modeled >> nohz interactions, ipi and stop-task support. >> >> - Support for record and replay of application scheduling via perf. >> This is not yet well integrated, but under tests exist the tools to >> record an applications behavior using perf sched record, and then play >> it back in the simulator. >> >> - Load-balancer scoring. This one is a very promising new avenue for >> load-balancer testing. We analyzed several workloads and found that >> they could be well-modeled using a log-normal distribution. >> Parameterizing these models then allows us to construct a large (500) >> test-case set of randomly generated workloads that behave similarly. >> By integrating the variance between the current load-balance and an >> offline computed (currently greedy first-fit) balance we're able to >> automatically identify and score an approximation of our distance from >> an ideal load-balance. Historically, such scores are very difficult >> to interpret, however, that's where our ability to generate a large >> set of test-cases above comes in. This allows us to exploit a nice >> property, it's much easier to design a scoring function that diverges >> (in this case the variance) than a nice stable one that converges. We >> can then catch regressions in load-balancer quality by measuring the >> divergence in this set of scoring functions across our set of >> test-cases. This particular feature needs a large set of >> documentation in itself (todo), but to get started with playing with >> it see Makefile.mcarlo-sims in tools/linsched/tests. In particular to >> evaluate the entire set across a variety of topologies the following >> command can be issued: >> make -j <num_cpus * 2 > -f Makefile.mcarlo-sims >> (The included 'diff-mcarlo-500' tool can then be used to make >> comparisons across result sets.) >> >> - Validation versus real hardware. Under tests/validation we've >> included a tool for replaying and recording the above simulations on a >> live-machine. These can then be compared to simulated runs using the >> tools above to ensure that LinSched is modelling your architecture >> reasonably appropriately. We did some reasonably extensive >> comparisons versus several x86 topologies in the v3.1 code using this; >> it's a fundamentally hard problem -- in particular there's much more >> clock drift between events on real hardware, but the results showed >> the included topologies to be a reasonable simulacrum under LinSched. >> >> What's to come? >> - More documentation, especially about the use of the new >> load-balancer scoring tools. >> - The history is very coarse right now as a result of going through a >> rebase cement-mixer. I'd like to incrementally refactor some of the >> larger commits; once this is done I will promote linsched-alpha to a >> stable linsched branch that won't be subject to history re-writes. >> - KBuild integration. We currently build everything out of the >> tools/linsched makefiles. One of the immediate TODOs involves >> re-working the arch/linsched half of this to work with kbuild so that >> its less hacky/fragile. >> - Writing up some of the existing TODOs as starting points for anyone >> who wants to get involved. >> >> I'd also like to take a moment to specially recognize the effort of >> the following contributors, all of whom were involved extensively in >> the work above. Things have come a long way since the 5000 lines of >> "#ifdef LINSCHED", the current status would not be possible without >> them. >> Ben Segall, Dhaval Giani, Ranjit Manomohan, Nikhil Rao, and Abhishek >> Srivastava >> >> Thanks! >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >> > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists