linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PWM: Add support for configuring polarity of PWM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Jul 2012 15:08:25 +0200
From:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
To:	"Philip, Avinash" <avinashphilip@...com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>,
	"Hebbar, Gururaja" <gururaja.hebbar@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PWM: Add support for configuring polarity of PWM

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:51:11PM +0000, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 14:00:32, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 06:24:13PM +0530, Philip, Avinash wrote:
[...]
> > > +
> > > +	if (test_bit(PWMF_ENABLED, &pwm->flags)) {
> > > +		dev_err(pwm->chip->dev,
> > > +			"Polarity configuration Failed!, PWM device enabled\n");
> > > +		return -EBUSY;
> > > +	}
> > 
> > Maybe something like: "polarity cannot be configured while PWM device is
> > enabled"?
> 
> Ok I will update.
> 
> > Though I'm not sure the error message is all that useful. I'd
> > expect the user driver to handle -EBUSY specially.
> 
> On EBUSY, client driver has to rework on it. Nothing to be done from
> framework

Exactly, so I think that if an error is displayed because the PWM has
been enabled, then that client (== user) driver should output an error
message, not the framework. Also, it really shouldn't happen because it
clearly is a driver problem that needs to be fixed.

> > >  /*
> > >   * pwm_enable - start a PWM output toggling
> > >   */
> > > @@ -37,6 +47,7 @@ struct pwm_chip;
> > >  enum {
> > >  	PWMF_REQUESTED = 1 << 0,
> > >  	PWMF_ENABLED = 1 << 1,
> > > +	PWMF_POLARITY_INVERSE = 1 << 2,
> > 
> > This should be named PWMF_POLARITY_INVERSED for consistency.
> 
> Ok I will correct it.
> 
> > I'm not sure that we really need this flag, though. It isn't used anywhere. But
> > maybe you have a use-case in mind?
> 
> It can be used to find the polarity of the PWM at runtime.

Yes, but is there any use-case where this information would be required?

Thierry

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped