linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/12] perf header: Reconstruct group relationship by parsing cmdline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 25 Jul 2012 17:39:32 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] perf header: Reconstruct group relationship by
 parsing cmdline

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 06:01:27PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> In order to support the event group viewer, their group relationship
> is needed. Since it's not recorded explicitly anywhere in the perf.data
> we should parse saved cmdline and apply the result to the evlist. It is
> assumed that parsed entries are in a same order with the originals.
> 
> I know it's fragile but hard to find other way to do it in the current
> condition. :(

How about storing grouping details in new perf.data feature?
As you said reparsing looks too fragile.

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/