linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] leds: triggers: send uevent when changing triggers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 31 Jul 2012 11:28:40 -0700
From:	Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
To:	Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@...onical.com>
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: triggers: send uevent when changing triggers

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@...onical.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 01:03:11PM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote:
>>> Just one quick patch for my idea: emitting a uevent in sysfs_create_file().
>>>
>>> --
>>> diff --git a/fs/sysfs/file.c b/fs/sysfs/file.c
>>> index 00012e3..04da869 100644
>>> --- a/fs/sysfs/file.c
>>> +++ b/fs/sysfs/file.c
>>> @@ -570,10 +570,14 @@ int sysfs_add_file(struct sysfs_dirent *dir_sd,
>>> const struct attribute *attr,
>>>
>>>  int sysfs_create_file(struct kobject * kobj, const struct attribute * attr)
>>>  {
>>> +       int err = 0;
>>> +
>>>         BUG_ON(!kobj || !kobj->sd || !attr);
>>>
>>> -       return sysfs_add_file(kobj->sd, attr, SYSFS_KOBJ_ATTR);
>>> +       err = sysfs_add_file(kobj->sd, attr, SYSFS_KOBJ_ATTR);
>>> +       kobject_uevent(kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
>>
>> That's a veritable flood of change events when a new kobject is created,
>> right?  It also created uevents for a device that has not told userspace
>> that it is even present, which could cause massive confusion, don't you
>> think?
>>
>
> Indeed, this is unacceptable. I reworked a new patchset and just sent
> our for you review.
>
> Thanks,
> -Bryan

Given the rejection of the other solutions to this problem, and chance
of getting this acked?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/