linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] Input: ab8500-ponkey: Make the distinction between DT and non-DT boots

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 8 Aug 2012 10:59:29 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Input: ab8500-ponkey: Make the distinction between
 DT and non-DT boots

On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 08:28:35AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> In general, it seems easier to use the same domain type for both cases.
> I don't think that MOP500_AB8500_VIR_GPIO_IRQ_BASE is used anywhere
> else besides the .irq_base definition in board-mop500.c, so I would guess
> that you can just remove that identifier and always use the linear
> domain.

Given how easy this is to get working it doesn't seem sensible to avoid
it - there's a clear pattern already for maintaining support for legacy
domains.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/