[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 09:18:50 -0400
From: Cyril Chemparathy <cyril@...com>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/22] ARM: add mechanism for late code patching
On 08/08/12 01:56, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2012, Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
[...]
>> u32 arm_check[] = {
>> 0xe2810041, 0xe2810082, 0xe2810f41, 0xe2810f82, 0xe2810e41,
>> 0xe2810e82, 0xe2810d41, 0xe2810d82, 0xe2810c41, 0xe2810c82,
>> 0xe2810b41, 0xe2810b82, 0xe2810a41, 0xe2810a82, 0xe2810941,
>> 0xe2810982, 0xe2810841, 0xe2810882, 0xe2810741, 0xe2810782,
>> 0xe2810641, 0xe2810682, 0xe2810541, 0xe2810582, 0xe2810441,
>> };
>
> Instead of using this array you could let the assembler do it for you
> like this:
>
> asm (" \n\
> .arm \n\
> arm_check: \n\
> .set shft, 0 \n\
> .rep 12 \n\
> add r1, r2, #0x81 << \shft \n\
> .set shft, \shft + 2 \n\
> .endr \n\
> ");
>
Neat macro magic. Are you thinking that we build this in as a self test
in the code?
Thanks
-- Cyril.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists