linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] mm: Restructure kmem_cache_create() to move debug cache integrity checks into a new function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 08 Aug 2012 09:13:52 -0600
From:	Shuah Khan <shuah.khan@...com>
To:	"Christoph Lameter (Open Source)" <cl@...ux.com>
Cc:	JoonSoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	glommer@...allels.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, shuah.khan@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] mm: Restructure kmem_cache_create() to move
 debug cache integrity checks into a new function

On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 09:14 -0500, Christoph Lameter (Open Source)
wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2012, Shuah Khan wrote:
> 
> > No reason, just something I am used to doing :) inline is a good idea. I
> > can fix that easily and send v2 patch.
> 
> Leave that to the compiler. There is no performance reason that would
> give a benefit from forcing inline.
> 

Already fixed in the v2 patch.

Thanks,
-- Shuah

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/