lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 10:13:56 +0530 From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com> To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>, Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>, Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, stan_shebs@...tor.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86/uprobes: implement x86 specific arch_uprobe_*_step On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 04:53:45PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 08/08, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: ... > >> ->insn[0] doesn't look right, we should skip the prefixes. insn_init() insn_get_opcode() if (OPCODE1() == 0x9d) is always the right way of doing it. ... > And in any case it would be better to re-use auprobe->fixups. Agreed. Ananth -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists