linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: core: Fix coding style issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:02:33 +0200
From:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
To:	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: core: Fix coding style issues

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 03:29:08PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> On 10 August 2012 15:25, Thierry Reding
> <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:12:10AM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> >> Fixes the following:
> >> WARNING: line over 80 characters
> >> ERROR: spaces required around that ':' (ctx:VxW)
> >> WARNING: Prefer pr_warn(... to pr_warning(...
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/pwm/core.c |    6 +++---
> >>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c
> >> index efc20f8..929be13 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/pwm/core.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c
> >> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static int pwm_device_request(struct pwm_device *pwm, const char *label)
> >>  }
> >>
> >>  static struct pwm_device *of_pwm_simple_xlate(struct pwm_chip *pc,
> >> -                                           const struct of_phandle_args *args)
> >> +                                          const struct of_phandle_args *args)
> >>  {
> >>       struct pwm_device *pwm;
> >>
> >
> > Can this hunk be removed, please? I think aligning the arguments is more
> > useful than respecting the 80-columns limit.
> 
> Sure, if you think so. Anyway it was just one space deleted. Do you
> want me to re-send the patch?

No, with your permission, I'll just leave that hunk out and remove the
"WARNING: line over 80 characters" line from the commit message.

Thierry

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped