lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 10 Aug 2012 14:08:24 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jengelh@...i.de
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, arnd@...db.de,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MPILIB: Provide count_leading/trailing_zeros() based
 on arch functions

From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 14:51:49 +0200 (CEST)

> 
> On Saturday 2012-07-21 02:46, David Miller wrote:
>>> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I don't generally like to put stuff into asm-generic when it's unlikely
>>>> to be overridden by architectures. It would really belong into
>>>> include/linux, but then again we have all the other bitops in asm-generic
>>>> as well, so whatever...
>>> 
>>> Some arches (such as Sparc, I think) have count-leading-zero instructions.
>>
>>Yes, newer sparc64 chips have leading-zero-detect, and I was pretty
>>sure that powerpc had something similar.  It's called count-leading-
>>zeros or something like that.
> 
> And gcc has a __builtin_clz.

Which I can't use.  I have to patch the code at run time based upon
whether the cpu has the 'lzd' instruction or not.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ