lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 12 Aug 2012 10:10:13 +0800
From:	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To:	Michael Cree <mcree@...on.net.nz>
Cc:	linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	John David Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Kyle McMartin <kyle@...isc-linux.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [next:akpm 129/309] net/core/sock.c:274:36: error: initializer
 element is not constant

On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 01:33:09PM +1200, Michael Cree wrote:
> On 03/08/12 03:02, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:06:41AM -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:10 PM, James Bottomley
> >> <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com> wrote:
> >>>> Here is the line in sock.i:
> >>>>
> >>>> struct static_key memalloc_socks = ((struct static_key) { .enabled =
> >>>> ((atomic_t) { (0) }) });
> >>>
> >>> The above line contains two compound literals.  It also uses a designated
> >>> initializer to initialize the field enabled.  A compound literal is not a
> >>> constant expression.
> >>
> >> Seeing the same thing on ia64 building next-20120726.  Same fix works
> >> for me ... so I'll steal this whole changelog and attributes.
> > 
> > I got the same error for alpha, the same fix applies.
> 
> Just trying this patch on Alpha against v3.6-rc1 and it leads to new
> compilation errors, namely:
> 
> init/init_task.c:12: error: braced-group within expression allowed only
> inside a function
> init/init_task.c:13: error: braced-group within expression allowed only
> inside a function
> init/init_task.c:16: error: braced-group within expression allowed only
> inside a function
> init/init_task.c:16: error: braced-group within expression allowed only
> inside a function
> make[1]: *** [init/init_task.o] Error 1

Sorry! This will actually compile:

-#define ATOMIC_INIT(i)         ( { (i) } )
+#define ATOMIC_INIT(i)         { (i) }

Ditto for the 64bit version. I'll send the updated patch.

Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ