lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 13 Aug 2012 21:39:10 +0800
From:	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>,
	linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [userns:userns-always-map-user-v45 80/99] fs/namespace.c:2290:1:
 error: unknown type name 'atomic64_t'

On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:56:45PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com> writes:
> 
> > Hi Geert,
> >
> > This is the build error I get, on Eric's userns tree.
> >
> > tree:   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace.git userns-always-map-user-v45
> > head:   38a0b1b84f5f613ff4e01fffda27f87d4cb2b649
> > commit: 5ea9fc30545b658380d4794340227fe821b83701 [80/99] vfs: Add setns support for the mount namespace
> > config: m68k-m5475evb_defconfig (attached as .config)
> >
> > All related error/warning messages:
> >
> > fs/namespace.c:2290:1: error: unknown type name 'atomic64_t'
> > fs/namespace.c:2290:1: error: implicit declaration of function 'ATOMIC64_INIT' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > fs/namespace.c:2290:1: error: initializer element is not constant
> > fs/namespace.c: In function 'alloc_mnt_ns':
> > fs/namespace.c:2299:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'atomic64_add_return' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> 
> Fengguang is m68k the only place you are seeing build failures?

Yes.

> Exactly how I get a 64bit counter in that code path is not terribly
> important.  I picked an atomic64_t because it looked simple and cheap.

Fair enough. As long as it's not in hot code path, it definitely helps
to use simple solutions.

> If this is limited to a couple of m68k sub-arches I will let you guys
> finish fixing this up so people can depend on atomic64_t being
> available.  Otherwise it probably makes sense to go to with a different
> abstraction.

I'd suggest to fix it in m68k and make atomic64_t generally available.

Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ