linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] i2c: pnx: Fix bit definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:51:08 +0200
From:	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To:	Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>, kevin.wells@....com
Cc:	vitalywool@...il.com, khali@...ux-fr.org, ben-linux@...ff.org,
	grant.likely@...retlab.ca, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kevin.wells@....com,
	srinivas.bakki@....com, aletes.xgr@...il.com, jonsmirl@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] i2c: pnx: Fix bit definitions

On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 09:42:31AM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> The I2C Control Register bits RFDAIE and RFFIE were mixed up. In addition to
> this fix, this patch adds the missing bit DRSIE for completeness.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
> 
> ---
> Applies to v3.6-rc1
> 
> This patch for i2c-pnx affects PNX4008 and LPC32xx (and LPC31xx, not yet in
> mainline). Can you please test and double-check the manuals of PNX4008 and
> LPC31xx? I only found this via the manual of LPC32xx but assume it's the same
> for the others, also.
> 
> Thanks in advance!

Kevin, since the other manuals seem to be not easily available, can you
please check?

Thanks,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)