linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c-i801: Add device tree support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 18 Aug 2012 14:16:28 +0200
From:	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
Cc:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-i801: Add device tree support

On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 01:17:45PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 11:48:46AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 09:06:47AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > This commit adds support for probing slave devices parsed from the
> > > device tree.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
> > 
> > How are the devicetree nodes of the slaves connected to this PCI device
> > which should not have a node itself?
> 
> The matching is done by pci_set_of_node() and pci_set_bus_of_node().
> The latter will eventually call pcibios_get_phb_of_node(). What makes
> you say that PCI devices shouldn't have nodes themselves?

I thought to recall that busses which can be probed at runtime should
not have nodes but should be probed. Maybe that was wrong. Can you point
me to a dts-file with an example?

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)