lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:20:35 +0800
From:	Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
CC:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic, under native_smp_prepare_cpus()

On 08/17/2012 09:49 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:

Hi, FengGuang

native_smp_prepare_cpus has already disabled the preempt before
reach __irq_alloc_descs(), and sleep in mutex_lock() cause the bug.

May be the follow patch could help to solve the issue(actually I
think the true problem should be in _cond_resched...).

I can't do test by my self since I can't reproduce the issue on my
machine, the kernel_init thread never got a need sched flag set at
that moment in my case...

Regards,
Michael Wang

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 4376c9f..3396c33 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3321,7 +3321,8 @@ static inline void schedule_debug(struct task_struct *prev)
         * schedule() atomically, we ignore that path for now.
         * Otherwise, whine if we are scheduling when we should not be.
         */
-       if (unlikely(in_atomic_preempt_off() && !prev->exit_state))
+       if (unlikely(in_atomic_preempt_off() && !prev->exit_state
+                                       && system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING))
                __schedule_bug(prev);
        rcu_sleep_check();


> Trace one (full config/dmesg attached):
> 
> [    0.042794] init IO_APIC IRQs [    0.043305]  apic 2 pin 0 not 
> connected [    0.043953] BUG: scheduling while atomic: 
> swapper/0/1/0x10000002 [    0.044017] no locks held by swapper/0/1. [
> 0.044692] Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 
> 3.6.0-rc1-00420-gb7aebb9 #34 [    0.045861] Call Trace: [ 0.048071] 
> [<c106361e>] __schedule_bug+0x5e/0x70 [    0.048890] [<c1b28701>] 
> __schedule+0x91/0xb10 [    0.049660]  [<c14472ea>] ? 
> vsnprintf+0x33a/0x450 [    0.050444]  [<c1060006>] ? 
> lg_local_lock+0x6/0x70 [    0.051256]  [<c14fb5b1>] ? 
> wait_for_xmitr+0x31/0x90 [    0.052019]  [<c144fd55>] ? 
> do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa5/0xf0 [    0.052903]  [<c1b2a532>] ? 
> _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x30 [    0.053759]  [<c105cdbb>] ? 
> up+0x1b/0x70 [    0.054421]  [<c1065d6b>] __cond_resched+0x1b/0x30 [
>  0.055228]  [<c1b292d5>] _cond_resched+0x45/0x50 [    0.056020] 
> [<c1b26c58>] mutex_lock_nested+0x28/0x370 [    0.056884]
> [<c1034222>] ? console_unlock+0x3a2/0x4e0 [    0.057741]
> [<c1ac8559>] __irq_alloc_descs+0x39/0x1c0 [    0.058589]
> [<c10223bc>] io_apic_setup_irq_pin+0x2c/0x310 [    0.060042]
> [<c20638df>] setup_IO_APIC+0x101/0x744 [    0.060878]  [<c1021d51>] ?
>  clear_IO_APIC+0x31/0x50 [    0.061695]  [<c20600f4>] 
> native_smp_prepare_cpus+0x538/0x680 [    0.062644]  [<c2056a91>] ? 
> do_one_initcall+0x12c/0x12c [    0.063517]  [<c2056a91>] ? 
> do_one_initcall+0x12c/0x12c [    0.064016]  [<c2056adc>] 
> kernel_init+0x4b/0x17f [    0.064790]  [<c2056a91>] ? 
> do_one_initcall+0x12c/0x12c [    0.065660]  [<c1b2bbd6>] 
> kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x10 [    0.066592] IOAPIC[0]: Set routing 
> entry (2-1 -> 0x41 -> IRQ 1 Mode:0 Active:0 Dest:1) [    0.068045] 
> IOAPIC[0]: Set routing entry (2-2 -> 0x51 -> IRQ 0 Mode:0 Active:0 
> Dest:1)
> 
> Trace two (triggered by another config):
> 
> [    0.288018] tlb_flushall_shift is 0xffffffff [    0.316019] 
> Freeing SMP alternatives: 20k freed [    0.364022] BUG: scheduling 
> while atomic: swapper/0/1/0x10000002 [    0.364022] no locks held by
>  swapper/0/1. [    0.368023] Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 
> 3.6.0-rc1 #1 [    0.368023] Call Trace: [    0.368023]  [<79812e23>]
>  __schedule_bug+0x41/0x53 [    0.372023]  [<79820393>] 
> __schedule+0x62/0x488 [    0.376023]  [<792d17ae>] ? 
> radix_tree_lookup+0xa/0xc [    0.376023]  [<79071f4e>] ? 
> rcu_irq_exit+0x61/0x66 [    0.376023]  [<79026be7>] ? 
> irq_exit+0x60/0x6c [    0.376023]  [<790035df>] ? do_IRQ+0x6c/0x80 [
>  0.380023]  [<7903d794>] __cond_resched+0x16/0x26 [    0.380023] 
> [<79820888>] _cond_resched+0x13/0x1c [    0.380023]  [<7909f30a>] 
> slab_pre_alloc_hook.isra.44+0x2e/0x33 [    0.380023]  [<790a09c6>] 
> kmem_cache_alloc+0x1b/0xbb [    0.384024]  [<792ce416>] ? 
> alloc_cpumask_var_node+0x1a/0x72 [    0.384024]  [<792ce416>] 
> alloc_cpumask_var_node+0x1a/0x72 [    0.384024]  [<792ce486>] 
> alloc_cpumask_var+0xb/0xd [    0.388024]  [<792ce493>] 
> zalloc_cpumask_var+0xb/0xd [    0.388024]  [<79bfe1fd>] 
> native_smp_prepare_cpus+0x93/0x380 [    0.388024]  [<79bf6a7e>] ? 
> do_one_initcall+0x10c/0x10c [    0.388024]  [<79bf6ac6>] 
> kernel_init+0x48/0x16e [    0.392024]  [<79bf6a7e>] ? 
> do_one_initcall+0x10c/0x10c [    0.392024]  [<7982241e>] 
> kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0xd [    0.400025] smpboot: SMP disabled [ 
> 0.400025] Performance Events:
> 
> Thanks, Fengguang
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ