linux-kernel - [tip:x86/microcode] x86, microcode, AMD: Check before applying a patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:42:17 -0700
From:	tip-bot for Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...ux.intel.com, borislav.petkov@....com
Subject: [tip:x86/microcode] x86, microcode, AMD:
  Check before applying a patch

Commit-ID:  685ca6d797af9d41164dd64dd60145d4946fc152
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/685ca6d797af9d41164dd64dd60145d4946fc152
Author:     Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:17:51 +0200
Committer:  H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
CommitDate: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:15:41 -0700

x86, microcode, AMD: Check before applying a patch

Make sure we're actually applying a microcode patch to a core which
really needs it.

This brings only a very very very minor slowdown on F10:

0.032218828 sec vs 0.056010626 sec with this patch.

And small speedup on F15:

0.487089449 sec vs 0.180551162 sec (from perf output).

Also, fixup comments while at it.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1344361461-10076-8-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c |   13 ++++++++++---
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
index 9421338..8fdf7d9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
@@ -202,11 +202,18 @@ static int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu)
 	if (mc_amd == NULL)
 		return 0;
 
-	wrmsrl(MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LOADER, (u64)(long)&mc_amd->hdr.data_code);
-	/* get patch id after patching */
 	rdmsr(MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LEVEL, rev, dummy);
 
-	/* check current patch id and patch's id for match */
+	/* need to apply patch? */
+	if (rev >= mc_amd->hdr.patch_id) {
+		c->microcode = rev;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	wrmsrl(MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LOADER, (u64)(long)&mc_amd->hdr.data_code);
+
+	/* verify patch application was successful */
+	rdmsr(MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LEVEL, rev, dummy);
 	if (rev != mc_amd->hdr.patch_id) {
 		pr_err("CPU%d: update failed for patch_level=0x%08x\n",
 		       cpu, mc_amd->hdr.patch_id);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/