linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/36] AutoNUMA24

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:42:38 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>,
	Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@...il.com>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
	Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricfo@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Don Morris <don.morris@...com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/36] AutoNUMA24


* Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:40:48PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On 08/22/2012 10:58 AM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > > >Hello everyone,
> > > >
> > > >Before the Kernel Summit, I think it's good idea to post a new
> > > >AutoNUMA24 and to go through a new review cycle. The last review cycle
> > > >has been fundamental in improving the patchset. Thanks!
> > > 
> > > Thanks for improving the code and incorporating all our 
> > > feedback. The AutoNUMA codebase is now in a state where I can 
> > > live with it.
> > > 
> > > I hope the code will be acceptable to others, too.
> > 
> > Lots of scheduler changes. Has all of peterz's review feedback 
> > been addressed?
> 
> git diff --stat origin kernel/sched/
>  kernel/sched/Makefile |    1 +
>  kernel/sched/core.c   |    1 +
>  kernel/sched/fair.c   |   86 ++++++-
>  kernel/sched/numa.c   |  604 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/sched/sched.h  |   19 ++
>  5 files changed, 699 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> Lots of scheduler changes only if CONFIG_AUTONUMA=y.

That's a lot of scheduler changes.

> [...] If CONFIG_AUTONUMA=n it's just 107 lines of scheduler 
> changes (numa.c won't get built in that case).
> 
> > Hm, he isn't even Cc:-ed, how is that supposed to work?
> 
> I separately forwarded him the announcement email because I 
> wanted to add a few more (minor) details for him. Of course 
> Peter's review is fundamental and appreciated and already 
> helped to make the code a lot better.

I see no reason why such details shouldn't be discussed openly 
and why forwarding him things separately should cause you to 
drop a scheduler co-maintainer from the Cc:, with a 700 lines 
kernel/sched/ diffstat ...

> His previous comments should have been addressed, [...]

That's good news. Peter?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/