linux-kernel - [PATCH] x86, apm: Make on_cpu0() use workqueue instead of work_on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:11:34 -0700
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] x86, apm: Make on_cpu0() use workqueue instead of
 work_on_cpu()

Make APM schedule a work item on CPU0 instead of using the expensive
work_on_cpu(); hopefully, this is the last user of work_on_cpu() and
we can take out work_on_cpu() in not too distant future.

Tested both paths.  Seems to work fine.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c |   31 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c
index d65464e..2bdb8c4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c
@@ -605,28 +605,43 @@ static long __apm_bios_call(void *_call)
 	return call->eax & 0xff;
 }
 
+struct on_cpu0_arg {
+	struct work_struct	work;
+	long			(*fn)(void *);
+	struct apm_bios_call	*call;
+	int			ret;
+};
+
+static void on_cpu0_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct on_cpu0_arg *arg = container_of(work, struct on_cpu0_arg, work);
+
+	arg->ret = arg->fn(arg->call);
+}
+
 /* Run __apm_bios_call or __apm_bios_call_simple on CPU 0 */
 static int on_cpu0(long (*fn)(void *), struct apm_bios_call *call)
 {
-	int ret;
+	struct on_cpu0_arg arg = { .fn = fn, .call = call };
 
-	/* Don't bother with work_on_cpu in the common case, so we don't
-	 * have to worry about OOM or overhead. */
+	/* directly invoke on_cpu0_workfn() in the common case */
 	if (get_cpu() == 0) {
-		ret = fn(call);
+		on_cpu0_workfn(&arg.work);
 		put_cpu();
 	} else {
 		put_cpu();
-		ret = work_on_cpu(0, fn, call);
+		INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&arg.work, on_cpu0_workfn);
+		schedule_work_on(0, &arg.work);
+		flush_work(&arg.work);
 	}
 
 	/* work_on_cpu can fail with -ENOMEM */
-	if (ret < 0)
-		call->err = ret;
+	if (arg.ret < 0)
+		call->err = arg.ret;
 	else
 		call->err = (call->eax >> 8) & 0xff;
 
-	return ret;
+	return arg.ret;
 }
 
 /**
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/