lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:08:38 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
To:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu,
	andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86: fix microcode revision check for SNB-PEBS

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 03:34:34PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> 
> The following patch, relative to 3.6.0-rc3, makes
> the microcode update code path actually invoke the
> perf_check_microcode() function and thus potentially
> renabling SNB PEBS.
> 
> By default, CONFIG_MICROCODE_OLD_INTERFACE is
> forced to Y in arch/x86/Kconfig. There is no
> way to disable this. That means that the code
> path used in arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c
> did not include the call to perf_check_microcode().
> 
> Thus, even though the microcode was updated to a
> version that fixes the SNB PEBS problem, perf_event
> would still return EOPNOTSUPP when enabling precise
> sampling.
> 
> This patch simply adds a call to perf_check_microcode()
> in the call path used when OLD_INTERFACE=y.

Ok, so c93dc84cbe324 added calls to perf_check_microcode but it looks
like you're updating the microcode from /dev/cpu/microcode, correct?

And if so, the old interface got missed.

Oh well, as long as we have to support it, we might as well add that
perf call there - it will go when the interface goes anyway so until
then:

Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>

>
> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
> ---
> 
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c
> @@ -225,6 +225,9 @@ static ssize_t microcode_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
>  	if (do_microcode_update(buf, len) == 0)
>  		ret = (ssize_t)len;
>  
> +	if (ret > 0)
> +		perf_check_microcode();
> +
>  	mutex_unlock(&microcode_mutex);
>  	put_online_cpus();
>  
> 

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ