linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] slub: correct the calculation of the number of cpu objects in get_partial

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:15:16 +0000
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
cc:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] slub: correct the calculation of the number of cpu
 objects in get_partial_node

On Sat, 25 Aug 2012, Joonsoo Kim wrote:

> index d597530..c96e0e4 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -1538,6 +1538,7 @@ static void *get_partial_node(struct kmem_cache *s,
>  {
>  	struct page *page, *page2;
>  	void *object = NULL;
> +	int cpu_slab_objects = 0, pobjects = 0;

We really need be clear here.

One counter is for the numbe of objects in the per cpu slab and the other
for the objects in tbhe per cpu partial lists.

So I think the first name is ok. Second should be similar

cpu_partial_objects?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/