linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/11] rcu: Add missing RCU idle APIs on idle loop v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 24 Aug 2012 20:50:47 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
	"3.2.x.." <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chen Liqin <liqin.chen@...plusct.com>,
	Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@...il.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
	Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
	Parisc <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@...panasonic.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
	Hirokazu Takata <takata@...ux-m32r.org>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
	Mikael Starvik <starvik@...s.com>,
	Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>,
	Cris <linux-cris-kernel@...s.com>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
	alpha <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
	Michael Cree <mcree@...on.net.nz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] rcu: Add missing RCU idle APIs on idle loop v2

On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 02:19:14AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 14:26 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 04:58:24PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Changes since v1:
> > > 
> > > - Fixed preempt handling in alpha idle loop
> > > - added ack from Geert
> > > - fixed stable email address, sorry :-/
> > > 
> > > This time I built tested everywhere but: h8300 (compiler internal error),
> > > and mn10300, parisc, score (cross compilers not available in
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/4.6.3/)
> > > 
> > > For testing, you can pull from:
> > > 
> > > git://github.com/fweisbec/linux-dynticks.git
> > > 	rcu/idle-fix-v2 
> > > 
> > > Thanks.
> > 
> > I have queued these on -rcu branch rcu/idle:
> > 
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git
> > 
> > This problem has been in place since 3.3, so it is hard to argue that
> > it is a regression for this merge window.  I have therefore queued it
> > for 3.7.
> 
> I don't follow that; I would expect any serious bug fix (serious enough
> for a stable update) to be acceptable for 3.6 at this point.

OK, if any of the arch maintainers wishes to submit the patch to 3.6,
they are free to do so -- just let me know and I will drop the patch from
my tree.

That said, all this does is cause spurious warnings to be printed, so
not sure it really qualifies as serious.  But I am happy to leave that
decision with the individual arch maintainers -- it is their arch,
after all, so their decision.

							Thanx, Paul

> If the regression occurred in 3.3, then the cc lines should be something
> like:
> 
>     Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 3.3+
> 
> and not the current:
> 
>     Cc: 3.2.x.. <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> 
> (Note, version annotations should be on the right of the address, not in
> the 'real name' position on the left.)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/