linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: mach-pnx4008: Remove architecture

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 26 Aug 2012 04:41:25 +0000
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
Cc:	"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	bigeasy@...utronix.de, aletes.xgr@...il.com, kevin.wells@....com,
	srinivas.bakki@....com,
	Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: mach-pnx4008: Remove architecture

On Friday 24 August 2012, Roland Stigge wrote:
> On 23/08/12 14:22, Roland Stigge wrote:
> > This patch removes the ARM architecture mach-pnx4008. No direct support or user
> > feedback since 2006. Acknowledgements from NXP/Philips and Linux arm-soc
> > maintainers.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
> 
> The patch was a bit too big for the mailing list - sorry.
> 
> Now re-proposing via pull request, below.

I think the removal of the frame buffer driver should go separately via the
framebuffer maintainer (Florian Schandinat), I can take the rest through the
arm-soc tree.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/