linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v11 3/4] drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c: add new driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:32:11 +0200
From:	"Voss, Nikolaus" <N.Voss@...nmann.de>
To:	"'Yanes Martinez Adrian'" <adrian.yanes@...to.fi>,
	"'ludovic.desroches'" <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
CC:	"'linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org'" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"'linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
	"'nicolas.ferre@...el.com'" <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	"'ben-linux@...ff.org'" <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	"'balbi@...com'" <balbi@...com>,
	"'h.feurstein@...il.com'" <h.feurstein@...il.com>,
	"'rmallon@...il.com'" <rmallon@...il.com>,
	"'carsten.behling@...z-fricke.com'" <carsten.behling@...z-fricke.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v11 3/4] drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c: add new driver

Hi Adian,

Yanes Martinez Adrian wrote on Monday, August 27, 2012 2:46 PM:
> Le 08/27/2012 12:40 PM, Yanes Martinez Adrian a écrit :
>> Hi Ludovic,
>>
>>> Tested on at91rm9200, at91sam9261, at91sam9g20 and at91sam9m10 with
>>> eeprom, temperature sensor and rtc devices (and wolfson chip for
>>> sam9g20).
>>
>> concerning the at91rm9200, what was the amount of bytes you
> transmitted?
>>
> 
>> I have only checked that I can communicate with i2c devices so the
>> amount is very low (1-4 bytes).
> 
> IIRC it was from >7 bytes when the issues appeared.
> 
>> Some months ago I performed some testing[1] with the previous version of
>> the patch and the main conclusion was that the absence of PDC in the
>> AT91RM9200 made this driver unusable in such platform.

I didn't get your last post  in that thread. In my opinion RM9200 should really
be excluded from being configured with this driver, what's your opinion
Ludovic?

Regards,
Niko

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/