linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm-current tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 4 Sep 2012 16:06:26 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm-current
 tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mm/mmu.c between commit a849088aa155 ("ARM: Fix ioremap() of
address zero") from the arm-current tree and commit c2794437091a ("ARM:
Add fixed PCI i/o mapping") from the arm-soc tree.

I am not sure how to fix this, so I have used the arm-current version of
the change to pmd_empty_section_gap() since that changed the vm->flags.
It may be that just changing the vm->flags value in vm_reserve_area_early()
would be ok?
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped