linux-kernel - Re: [st-ericsson] [PATCH 02/17] arm: ux500: add ccu9540 board support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 5 Sep 2012 14:41:27 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Loic PALLARDY STE <loic.pallardy-ext@...ricsson.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	STEricsson_nomadik_linux <STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com>,
	Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@...il.com>,
	LT ST-Ericsson <st-ericsson@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.com>
Subject: Re: [st-ericsson] [PATCH 02/17] arm: ux500: add ccu9540 board support

On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 September 2012, Loic PALLARDY wrote:
>>
>> On 09/05/2012 12:42 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 05 September 2012, Loic Pallardy wrote:
>> >> +MACHINE_START(U9540, "ST-Ericsson 9540 platform")
>> >> +       .atag_offset    = 0x100,
>> >> +       .map_io         = u8500_map_io,
>> >> +       .nr_irqs        = UX500_NR_IRQS,
>> >> +       .init_irq       = ux500_init_irq,
>> >> +       .timer          =&ux500_timer,
>> >> +       .handle_irq     = gic_handle_irq,
>> >> +       .init_machine   = u9540_init_machine,
>> >> +       .init_late      = ux500_init_late,
>> >> +MACHINE_END
>> >> +
>> >
>> > Please don't add another ATAG based board definition to ux500. We're closing in
>> > on having full support for DT booting with this platform, so your patch is just
>> > making it harder for us to complete this.
>> >
>> >       Arnd
>> Yes I know and agree.
>> Please consider this patch as a temporary one waiting for 9540 support
>> from Lee.
>
> Why are you even posting the patches that you know won't make it then?

My fault! I wanted an outside look at them before we take them
too far.

I should've requested to have the "RFC" prefix attached to them.

Sorry if it annoyed you too much...

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/