linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 0/4] Tools: hv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 5 Sep 2012 19:49:12 +0000
From:	KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
	"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
	"ben@...adent.org.uk" <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
	"thozza@...hat.com" <thozza@...hat.com>,
	"dcbw@...hat.com" <dcbw@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/4] Tools: hv



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@...uxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 3:39 PM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; devel@...uxdriverproject.org; olaf@...fle.de;
> apw@...onical.com; ben@...adent.org.uk; thozza@...hat.com;
> dcbw@...hat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Tools: hv
> 
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 07:24:37PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 10:01:59AM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> > > > This patchset was authored by Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>. Ben
> > > > asked me to submit this patchset. This patchset cleans up the KVP daemon
> > > > code and fixes some bugs.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > K. Y. Srinivasan (4):
> > > >   tools: hv: Fix file handle leak
> > > >   tools: hv: Fix exit() error code
> > > >   tools: hv: Check for read/write errors
> > > >   tools: hv: Parse /etc/os-release
> > >
> > > If Ben wrote these, why are you showing that you wrote them?
> >
> > Ben asked me to apply these patches on the tip (of my tree) and send the
> > patches out and that is what I did. I recreated these patches after applying to
> > my tree and that is what I have sent out. How could I have made the authorship
> > more clear (other than noting so in the comment which I have done).
> 
> You could have actually _kept_ the proper authorship information so that
> git shows who wrote the patch.  As your shortlog shows above, it looks
> like you wrote the patches, not Ben, which is not acceptable.

Obviously, I did not know how I could have done this. I will figure out the correct
way of doing this and resubmit these patches.

Thanks,

K. Y 



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/