lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:14:48 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya.rohm@...il.com>, Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>, Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] pch_uart: Add eg20t_port lock field, avoid recursive spinlocks On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 05:04:07PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > The following patch has been included in linux-next > (fe89def79c48e2149abdd1e816523e69a9067191) but has not yet landed in mainline > nor been queued for stable so far as I can determine. This patch addresses a > deadlock in mainline and is a prerequisite for an additional fix required by the > PREEMPT_RT kernel. Can we get this pulled into 3.4.11 please? 3.4.11? It has to hit Linus's tree first. > Perhaps I am > jumping the gun, but this patch was originally pulled on June 19, 2012. Remember, we missed a pull cycle for tty due to other problems, I thought I picked all of the different pieces needed for 3.6, but I must of missed this one. Should it go there now? Also, if you want a patch in the stable tree, please tell me when you submit it by marking it with a cc: stable <stable@...r.kernel.org> in the signed-off-by area of the patch. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists