linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/11] perf tool: precise mode requires exclude

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:17:19 -0600
From:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
CC:	acme@...stprotocols.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] perf tool: precise mode requires exclude_guest

On 9/6/12 1:02 PM, Robert Richter wrote:
> David,
>
> just found your patch...
>
> On 20.07.12 17:25:53, David Ahern wrote:
>> PEBS cannot be used with guest mode. If user adds :p modifier set
>> exclude_guest as well.
>
>> @@ -653,6 +653,9 @@ int parse_events_modifier(struct list_head *list, char *str)
>>   			eH = 0;
>>   		} else if (*str == 'p') {
>>   			precise++;
>> +			/* use of precise requires exclude_guest */
>> +			if (!exclude_GH)
>> +				eG = 1;
>
> We should only enable exclude_guest if no G/H modifiers are given on
> the command line. If I correctly read the code this is indicated by
> exclude_GH and correctly implemented.

yes.

>
> To summarize how I think it should work:
>
>   -e cycles:p ..... Enable exclude_guest bit. If the syscall fails,
>                     fall back by disabling the guest bit and send
>                     syscall again

I think the fallback scenarios are getting out of hand -- too many and 
too many combinations. For this case (:p only) I proposed setting 
exclude_guest. It should not fail if the pebs/ibs is supported. If so, 
give the user a helpful message. e.g., https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/20/440


>
>   -e cycles:pGH ... Do not enable exclude_guest/_host. Do not fall back
>                     on syscall errors.

In this case give the user a message that the requested combination is 
invalid. I have a patch similar to the one above for this.

>
> Same for the case the p modifier is not set.
>
> So we have the following:
>
>   G           ... set exclude_host bit, clear exclude_guest
>   H           ... set exclude_guest bit, clear exclude_host
>   GH          ... clear both exclude_guest/_host
>   <no G or H> ... default (set exclude_host bit, clear exclude_guest),
>                   but fall back on syscall errors to clear both
>                   exclude_guest/_host

you lost me on the last one. If the user specifies no attributes on the 
events then exclude_host/exclude_guest is controlled by the 
perf_host/perf_guest variables - see event_attr_init().

>
> The modifier parser should be correctly implemented and should work
> with ibs. Will test this patch.

Thanks!

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/