linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] clk: Provide option for clk_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 7 Sep 2012 23:34:01 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:	"Turquette, Mike" <mturquette@...com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...ricsson.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Philippe Begnic <philippe.begnic@...com>,
	Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] clk: Provide option for clk_get_rate to issue hw for
 new rate

On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 7 September 2012 10:21, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Turquette, Mike <mturquette@...com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com> wrote:
>>>> I'll take this series into clk-next.
>>>
>>> Oops, I forgot to ask about patch #3.  Which tree do you want that to
>>> go through?
>>
>> Just take it all through your tree if there are no major conflicts.
>> Acked-by etc.
>
> Agree, it makes it simpler to go through Mike's clock tree. At least
> let's try it out.
> I will likely have similar patch series with cross dependencies later
> on, so this can be a good first test and hopefully it works.

That will probably hit the next merge window anyway - these
patches will go into v3.7 as it looks, then you can finalize the
next series for v3.8.

> Although, don't we need an ack by Samuel Ortiz for the patch on mfd?
> "mfd: dbx500: Provide a more accurate smp_twd clock"

Confused, isn't that patch part of the latter series, and not
part of what Mike merged?

> Or, is it enough with Linus ack since he is the maintainer of that
> specific mfd file I have patched?

That's up to Mike, but I hardly think Sam is going to get very
angry about this if we merge it.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/