linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] MIPS: JZ4740: Move PWM driver to PWM framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 10 Sep 2012 19:30:56 +0200
From:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
To:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Cc:	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Antony Pavlov <antonynpavlov@...il.com>,
	Maarten ter Huurne <maarten@...ewalker.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] MIPS: JZ4740: Move PWM driver to PWM framework

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 05:20:34PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 09/10/2012 02:05 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> 
> I think v2 looks, good. Will give it some testing later.
> 
> > This small series fixes a build error due to a circular header
> > dependency, exports the timer API so it can be used outside of
> > the arch/mips/jz4740 tree and finally moves and converts the
> > JZ4740 PWM driver to the PWM framework.
> > 
> > Note that I don't have any hardware to test this on, so I had to
> > rely on compile tests only. Patches 1 and 2 should probably go
> > through the MIPS tree, while I can take patch 3 through the PWM
> > tree. It touches a couple of files in arch/mips but the changes
> > are unlikely to cause conflicts.
> 
> Patch 2 and 3 should probably go through the same tree since patch 3 depends
> on patch 2. I'd like to see them both go through the PWM tree.

That's fine with me. I'll probably need an Acked-by from Ralf just to be
safe.

> Patch 1 should go through the MIPS tree, but I still can't see why the issue
> should occur nor does it happen for anybody else except for you. Instead of
> moving the content over to the public irq.h I'd rather like to see the
> private irq.h being renamed.

If we can solve this some other way I'm all for it. Maybe you can share
the defconfig or .config that you use so I can test under the same
conditions.

Thierry

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped