lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 09:19:17 +0100 From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> To: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@...vo.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [RFC] cgroup TODOs On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 14:36 -0400, Aristeu Rozanski wrote: > also, heard about the desire of having a device namespace instead with > support for translation ("sda" -> "sdf"). If anyone see immediate use for > this please let me know. That sounds like a really bad idea to me. We've spent ages training users that the actual sd<x> name of their device doesn't matter and they should use UUIDs or WWNs instead ... why should they now care inside containers? James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists