| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 18:12:53 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH part2 6/6] PCI: Claim hw/fw allocated resources in hot add path.
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> During testing remove/rescan root bus 00, found
> [ 338.142574] bus: 'pci': really_probe: probing driver ata_piix with device 0000:00:01.1
> [ 338.146788] ata_piix 0000:00:01.1: device not available (can't reserve [io 0x01f0-0x01f7])
> [ 338.150565] ata_piix: probe of 0000:00:01.1 failed with error -22
>
> because that fixed resource is not claimed from
> arch/x86/pci/i386.c::pcibios_allocate_resources()
> that is init path.
>
> Try to claim those resources, so on the remove/rescan will still use old
> resources.
>
> It is some kind honoring HW/FW setting in the registers during hot add.
> esp root-bus hot add is through acpi, BIOS have chance to set some register
> for us.
>
> -v2: add rom resource claiming.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/pci/i386.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/pci/bus.c | 2 ++
> include/linux/pci.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/i386.c b/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
> index abf2a61..3cb7d66 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
> @@ -201,13 +201,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcibios_align_resource);
> * as well.
> */
>
> -static void __init pcibios_allocate_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +static void pcibios_allocate_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *dev)
This patch has a little too much going on at the same time. Can you
split the __init removal into its own patch so we can focus on what's
left by itself?
> {
> int idx;
> struct resource *r;
>
> for (idx = PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES; idx < PCI_NUM_RESOURCES; idx++) {
> r = &dev->resource[idx];
> + if (r->parent) /* Already allocated */
> + continue;
This is also a potentially interesting change that maybe should be in
its own patch.
> if (!r->flags)
> continue;
> if (!r->start || pci_claim_resource(dev, idx) < 0) {
> @@ -223,7 +225,7 @@ static void __init pcibios_allocate_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *dev)
> }
> }
>
> -static void __init pcibios_allocate_bus_resources(struct pci_bus *bus)
> +static void pcibios_allocate_bus_resources(struct pci_bus *bus)
> {
> struct pci_bus *child;
>
> @@ -239,7 +241,7 @@ struct pci_check_idx_range {
> int end;
> };
>
> -static void __init pcibios_allocate_dev_resources(struct pci_dev *dev, int pass)
> +static void pcibios_allocate_dev_resources(struct pci_dev *dev, int pass)
> {
> int idx, disabled, i;
> u16 command;
> @@ -292,7 +294,7 @@ static void __init pcibios_allocate_dev_resources(struct pci_dev *dev, int pass)
> }
> }
>
> -static void __init pcibios_allocate_resources(struct pci_bus *bus, int pass)
> +static void pcibios_allocate_resources(struct pci_bus *bus, int pass)
> {
> struct pci_dev *dev;
> struct pci_bus *child;
> @@ -306,7 +308,7 @@ static void __init pcibios_allocate_resources(struct pci_bus *bus, int pass)
> }
> }
>
> -static void __init pcibios_allocate_dev_rom_resource(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +static void pcibios_allocate_dev_rom_resource(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> struct resource *r;
>
> @@ -324,7 +326,7 @@ static void __init pcibios_allocate_dev_rom_resource(struct pci_dev *dev)
> r->start = 0;
> }
> }
> -static void __init __pcibios_allocate_rom_resources(struct pci_bus *bus)
> +static void __pcibios_allocate_rom_resources(struct pci_bus *bus)
> {
> struct pci_dev *dev;
> struct pci_bus *child;
> @@ -337,7 +339,7 @@ static void __init __pcibios_allocate_rom_resources(struct pci_bus *bus)
> __pcibios_allocate_rom_resources(child);
> }
> }
> -static void __init pcibios_allocate_rom_resources(struct pci_bus *bus)
> +static void pcibios_allocate_rom_resources(struct pci_bus *bus)
> {
> if (pci_probe & PCI_ASSIGN_ROMS)
> return;
> @@ -358,6 +360,18 @@ static int __init pcibios_assign_resources(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +void pcibios_resource_survey_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
> +{
> + dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &bus->dev, "Allocating resources\n");
> +
> + pcibios_allocate_bus_resources(bus);
> +
> + pcibios_allocate_resources(bus, 0);
> + pcibios_allocate_resources(bus, 1);
> +
> + pcibios_allocate_rom_resources(bus);
> +}
> +
> void __init pcibios_resource_survey(void)
I wish pcibios_resource_survey() could look like this:
void __init pcibios_resource_survey(void)
{
list_for_each_entry(bus, &pci_root_buses, node)
pcibios_resource_survey_bus(bus)
e820_reserve_resources_late();
...
but maybe there's a reason why pcibios_allocate_rom_resources() really
has to be in the pcibios_assign_resources() fs_initcall rather than in
pcibios_resource_survey().
> {
> struct pci_bus *bus;
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/bus.c b/drivers/pci/bus.c
> index 4b0970b..2882d01 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/bus.c
> @@ -154,6 +154,8 @@ pci_bus_alloc_resource(struct pci_bus *bus, struct resource *res,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +void __weak pcibios_resource_survey_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) { }
> +
> /**
> * pci_bus_add_device - add a single device
> * @dev: device to add
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index 1b460e1..29a4704 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -676,6 +676,7 @@ extern struct list_head pci_root_buses; /* list of all known PCI buses */
> /* Some device drivers need know if pci is initiated */
> extern int no_pci_devices(void);
>
> +void pcibios_resource_survey_bus(struct pci_bus *bus);
> void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *);
> int __must_check pcibios_enable_device(struct pci_dev *, int mask);
> /* Architecture specific versions may override this (weak) */
> --
> 1.7.7
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists