lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 21 Sep 2012 08:53:06 +0000
From:	"Hebbar, Gururaja" <gururaja.hebbar@...com>
To:	"Porter, Matt" <mporter@...com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	"Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	"Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@...com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
CC:	Linux DaVinci Kernel List 
	<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Linux Documentation List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Devicetree Discuss <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Dan Williams <djbw@...com>,
	Linux SPI Devel List 
	<spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	Linux OMAP List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 03/13] ARM: edma: add DT and runtime PM support for
 AM335x

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 20:13:36, Porter, Matt wrote:
> Adds support for parsing the TI EDMA DT data into the required
> EDMA private API platform data.
> 
> Calls runtime PM API only in the DT case in order to unidle the
> associated hwmods on AM335x.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matt Porter <mporter@...com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/common/edma.c           |  252 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  arch/arm/include/asm/mach/edma.h |    8 +-
>  2 files changed, 244 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

The binding documentation should be updated along with the driver
change that does introduce the binding. You could just merged patch #4
and #5.

> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/edma.c b/arch/arm/common/edma.c
> index 001d268..f337f81 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/common/edma.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/common/edma.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,13 @@
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/edma.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of_dma.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/mach/edma.h>
>  
> @@ -1366,30 +1373,236 @@ void edma_clear_event(unsigned channel)
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(edma_clear_event);
>  
>  /*-----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
> +static int edma_of_read_u32_to_s8_array(const struct device_node *np,
> +					 const char *propname, s8 *out_values,
> +					 size_t sz)
> +{
> +	struct property *prop = of_find_property(np, propname, NULL);
> +	const __be32 *val;
> +
> +	if (!prop)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	if (!prop->value)
> +		return -ENODATA;
> +	if ((sz * sizeof(u32)) > prop->length)
> +		return -EOVERFLOW;
> +
> +	val = prop->value;
> +
> +	while (sz--)
> +		*out_values++ = (s8)(be32_to_cpup(val++) & 0xff);
> +
> +	/* Terminate it */
> +	*out_values++ = -1;
> +	*out_values++ = -1;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int edma_of_read_u32_to_s16_array(const struct device_node *np,
> +					 const char *propname, s16 *out_values,
> +					 size_t sz)
> +{
> +	struct property *prop = of_find_property(np, propname, NULL);
> +	const __be32 *val;
> +
> +	if (!prop)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	if (!prop->value)
> +		return -ENODATA;
> +	if ((sz * sizeof(u32)) > prop->length)
> +		return -EOVERFLOW;
> +
> +	val = prop->value;
> +
> +	while (sz--)
> +		*out_values++ = (s16)(be32_to_cpup(val++) & 0xffff);
> +
> +	/* Terminate it */
> +	*out_values++ = -1;
> +	*out_values++ = -1;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int edma_of_parse_dt(struct device *dev,
> +			    struct device_node *node,
> +			    struct edma_soc_info *pdata)
> +{
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	u32 value;
> +	struct property *prop;
> +	size_t sz;
> +	struct edma_rsv_info *rsv_info;
> +	s16 (*rsv_chans)[2], (*rsv_slots)[2];
> +	s8 (*queue_tc_map)[2], (*queue_priority_map)[2];
> +
> +	ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "dma-channels", &value);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +	pdata->n_channel = value;
> +
> +	ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,edma-regions", &value);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +	pdata->n_region = value;
> +
> +	ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,edma-slots", &value);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +	pdata->n_slot = value;
> +
> +	pdata->n_cc = 1;
> +	/* This is unused */
> +	pdata->n_tc = 3;
> +
> +	rsv_info =
> +		devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct edma_rsv_info), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!rsv_info)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	pdata->rsv = rsv_info;
> +
> +	/* Build the reserved channel/slots arrays */
> +	prop = of_find_property(node, "ti,edma-reserved-channels", &sz);
> +	if (!prop)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	rsv_chans =
> +		devm_kzalloc(dev, sz/sizeof(s16) + 2*sizeof(s16), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!rsv_chans)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	pdata->rsv->rsv_chans = rsv_chans;
> +
> +	ret = edma_of_read_u32_to_s16_array(node, "ti,edma-reserved-channels",
> +					    (s16 *)rsv_chans, sz/sizeof(u32));
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	prop = of_find_property(node, "ti,edma-reserved-slots", &sz);
> +	if (!prop)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +

Binding Documentation mentions edma-reserved-[channels/slots] as optional. 
But here the code returns as error if they are not found. Kindly reconfirm

>From patch-set 5/13

+Optional properties:
+- ti,edma-reserved-channels: List of reserved channel regions
+- ti,edma-reserved-slots: List of reserved slot regions

> +	rsv_slots = devm_kzalloc(dev,
> +				 sz/sizeof(s16) + 2*sizeof(s16),
> +				 GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!rsv_slots)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	pdata->rsv->rsv_slots = rsv_slots;
> +
> +	ret = edma_of_read_u32_to_s16_array(node,
> +					    "ti,edma-reserved-slots",
> +					    (s16 *)rsv_slots,
> +					    sz/sizeof(u32));
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	prop = of_find_property(node, "ti,edma-queue-tc-map", &sz);
> +	if (!prop)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	queue_tc_map = devm_kzalloc(dev,
> +				    sz/sizeof(s8) + 2*sizeof(s8),
> +				    GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!rsv_slots)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	pdata->queue_tc_mapping = queue_tc_map;
> +
> +	ret = edma_of_read_u32_to_s8_array(node,
> +					   "ti,edma-queue-tc-map",
> +					   (s8 *)queue_tc_map,
> +					   sz/sizeof(u32));
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	prop = of_find_property(node, "ti,edma-queue-priority-map", &sz);
> +	if (!prop)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	queue_priority_map = devm_kzalloc(dev,
> +					  sz/sizeof(s8) + 2*sizeof(s8),
> +					  GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!rsv_slots)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	pdata->queue_priority_mapping = queue_priority_map;
> +
> +	ret = edma_of_read_u32_to_s8_array(node,
> +					   "ti,edma-queue-tc-map",
> +					   (s8 *)queue_priority_map,
> +					   sz/sizeof(u32));
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,edma-default-queue", &value);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +	pdata->default_queue = value;
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static struct of_dma_filter_info edma_filter_info = {
> +	.filter_fn = edma_filter_fn,
> +};
>  
>  static int __init edma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct edma_soc_info	**info = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> -	const s8		(*queue_priority_mapping)[2];
> -	const s8		(*queue_tc_mapping)[2];
> +	s8			(*queue_priority_mapping)[2];
> +	s8			(*queue_tc_mapping)[2];
>  	int			i, j, off, ln, found = 0;
>  	int			status = -1;
> -	const s16		(*rsv_chans)[2];
> -	const s16		(*rsv_slots)[2];
> +	s16			(*rsv_chans)[2];
> +	s16			(*rsv_slots)[2];

What is the significance of the number "2" in all above members?

>  	int			irq[EDMA_MAX_CC] = {0, 0};
>  	int			err_irq[EDMA_MAX_CC] = {0, 0};
>  	struct resource		*r[EDMA_MAX_CC] = {NULL};
> +	struct resource		res[EDMA_MAX_CC];
>  	resource_size_t		len[EDMA_MAX_CC];
>  	char			res_name[10];
>  	char			irq_name[10];
> +	struct device_node	*node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> +	struct device		*dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct edma_soc_info	*pdata;
> +
> +	if (node) {
> +		int ret;
> +		pdata = devm_kzalloc(dev,
> +				     sizeof(struct edma_soc_info),
> +				     GFP_KERNEL);
> +		edma_of_parse_dt(dev, node, pdata);
> +		info = &pdata;
> +		dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, edma_filter_info.dma_cap);
> +		of_dma_controller_register(dev->of_node,
> +					   of_dma_simple_xlate,
> +					   &edma_filter_info);
> +		pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> +		ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> +		if (IS_ERR_VALUE(ret)) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "pm_runtime_get_sync() failed\n");
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	}
>  
>  	if (!info)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
>  	for (j = 0; j < EDMA_MAX_CC; j++) {
> -		sprintf(res_name, "edma_cc%d", j);
> -		r[j] = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> +		if (node) {
> +			int err;
> +			err = of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &res[j]);
> +			if (err) {
> +				dev_err(dev,
> +					"unable to find 'reg' property\n");
> +				return -EIO;
> +			}
> +			r[j] = &res[j];
> +
> +		} else {
> +			sprintf(res_name, "edma_cc%d", j);
> +			r[j] = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev,
> +						IORESOURCE_MEM,
>  						res_name);
> +		}
>  		if (!r[j] || !info[j]) {
>  			if (found)
>  				break;
> @@ -1465,8 +1678,12 @@ static int __init edma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			}
>  		}
>  
> -		sprintf(irq_name, "edma%d", j);
> -		irq[j] = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, irq_name);
> +		if (node)
> +			irq[j] = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> +		else {
> +			sprintf(irq_name, "edma%d", j);
> +			irq[j] = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, irq_name);
> +		}
>  		edma_cc[j]->irq_res_start = irq[j];
>  		status = request_irq(irq[j], dma_irq_handler, 0, "edma",
>  					&pdev->dev);
> @@ -1476,8 +1693,12 @@ static int __init edma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			goto fail;
>  		}
>  
> -		sprintf(irq_name, "edma%d_err", j);
> -		err_irq[j] = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, irq_name);
> +		if (node)
> +			err_irq[j] = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 2);
> +		else {
> +			sprintf(irq_name, "edma%d_err", j);
> +			err_irq[j] = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, irq_name);
> +		}
>  		edma_cc[j]->irq_res_end = err_irq[j];
>  		status = request_irq(err_irq[j], dma_ccerr_handler, 0,
>  					"edma_error", &pdev->dev);
> @@ -1538,9 +1759,17 @@ fail1:
>  	return status;
>  }
>  
> +static const struct of_device_id edma_of_ids[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "ti,edma3", },
> +	{}
> +};
>  
>  static struct platform_driver edma_driver = {
> -	.driver.name	= "edma",
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name	= "edma",
> +		.of_match_table = edma_of_ids,

Won't this fail/warn when CONFIG_OF not selected/enabled?

> +	},
> +	.probe = edma_probe,
>  };
>  
>  static int __init edma_init(void)
> @@ -1548,4 +1777,3 @@ static int __init edma_init(void)
>  	return platform_driver_probe(&edma_driver, edma_probe);
>  }
>  arch_initcall(edma_init);
> -

Stray change I believe.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/edma.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/edma.h
> index 7e84c90..ce5f6f8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/edma.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/edma.h
> @@ -237,8 +237,8 @@ void edma_resume(unsigned channel);
>  
>  struct edma_rsv_info {
>  
> -	const s16	(*rsv_chans)[2];
> -	const s16	(*rsv_slots)[2];
> +	s16		(*rsv_chans)[2];
> +	s16		(*rsv_slots)[2];
>  };
>  
>  /* platform_data for EDMA driver */
> @@ -260,8 +260,8 @@ struct edma_soc_info {
>  	/* Resource reservation for other cores */
>  	struct edma_rsv_info	*rsv;
>  
> -	const s8	(*queue_tc_mapping)[2];
> -	const s8	(*queue_priority_mapping)[2];
> +	s8	(*queue_tc_mapping)[2];
> +	s8	(*queue_priority_mapping)[2];
>  };
>  
>  #endif
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
> Davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com
> http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
> 


Regards, 
Gururaja
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ