lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:35:23 -0700
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
Cc:	linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dm-devel@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk, neilb@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 20/26] block: Add bio_for_each_segment_all()

Hello,

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 05:22:31PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> This is part of the immutable bvec prep work; bio_for_each_segment() is
> going to have a different implementation so these need to be split
> apart.
>
> This change is also to better document the intent of code that's using
> it - bio_for_each_segment_all() is only legal to use for code that owns
> the bio.

How about something like following?

 __bio_for_each_segment() iterates bvecs from the specified index
 instead of bio->bv_idx.  Currently, the only usage is to walk all the
 bvecs after the bio has been advanced by specifying 0 index.

 To help immutable bvec implementation, replace it with
 bio_for_each_segment_all() which also better documents the intent of
 code that's using it.  Note that bio_for_each_segment_all() should
 only be used by the code which owns the bio.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ