linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v1] net: use a per task frag allocator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 22 Sep 2012 15:52:55 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc:	subramanian.vijay@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
	alexander.h.duyck@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] net: use a per task frag allocator

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 23:11:11 +0200

> On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 13:27 -0700, Vijay Subramanian wrote:
>> I get the following compile error with the newer version of the patch
>> 
>> net/sched/em_meta.c: In function ‘meta_int_sk_sendmsg_off’:
>> net/sched/em_meta.c:464: error: ‘struct sock’ has no member named
>> ‘sk_sndmsg_off’
>> make[1]: *** [net/sched/em_meta.o] Error 1
>> make: *** [net/sched/em_meta.o] Error 2
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Vijay
> 
> Oh well, I wonder what's the expected use of this crap...
> 
> Thanks, I'll fix this on v3 !

So many aspects of the meta match are an extreme burdon on development
because the keys it allows unnecessarily exposes internals of our
implementation.

Who really uses it?  Maybe we can schedule it for removal.