lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 07:39:39 +0200 From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com> To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com CC: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, fweisbec@...il.com Subject: Re: RCU idle CPU detection is broken in linux-next On 09/23/2012 02:21 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 02:27:35PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 07:50:29PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote: >>> On 09/22/2012 05:56 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >>>> And now the prime suspect is the new CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS=y. Do these >>>> warnings ever show up with CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS=n? >>> >>> It seems that disabling that does make the warnings go away. >>> >>> I'll keep the tests running in case it just reduces the chances or something >>> like that. >> >> Thank you for testing this! >> >> And of course the reason that I didn't see these problems is that I >> failed to update my tests to enable CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS. :-/ > > Also the fact that I run 32-bit guests on x86. Sigh! > > I take it that you are running 64-bit guests? Yes, that's correct. Thanks, Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists