linux-kernel - Re: [2.6.38-3.x] [BUG] soft lockup - CPU#X stuck for 23s! (vfs, autofs, vserver)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:10:30 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Paweł Sikora <pluto@...-linux.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	arekm@...-linux.org, baggins@...-linux.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.38-3.x] [BUG] soft lockup - CPU#X stuck for 23s! (vfs,
 autofs, vserver)

On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Paweł Sikora <pluto@...-linux.org> wrote:
>
>         br_read_lock(vfsmount_lock);

The vfsmount_lock is a "local-global" lock, where a read-lock is
rather cheap and takes just a per-cpu lock, but the downside is that a
write-lock is *very* expensive, and can cause serious trouble.

And the write lock is taken by the [un]mount() paths. Do *not* do
crazy things. If you do some insane "unmount and remount autofs" on a
1s granularity, you're doing insane things.

Why do you have that 1s timeout? Insane.

              Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/