linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/2] thermal: fair_share: Add missing static storage class specifiers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:34:10 +0000
From:	"R, Durgadoss" <durgadoss.r@...el.com>
To:	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	"patches@...aro.org" <patches@...aro.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] thermal: fair_share: Add missing static storage
 class specifiers



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sachin Kamat [mailto:sachin.kamat@...aro.org]
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 4:58 PM
> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: R, Durgadoss; Zhang, Rui; sachin.kamat@...aro.org; patches@...aro.org
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] thermal: fair_share: Add missing static storage class
> specifiers
> 
> Fixes the following sparse warnings:
> drivers/thermal/fair_share.c:80:5: warning:
> symbol 'fair_share_throttle' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/thermal/fair_share.c:111:25: warning:
> symbol 'thermal_gov_fair_share' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
Looks fine.
Acked-by: Durgadoss R <Durgadoss.r@...el.com>

Thanks,
Durga

> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/fair_share.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/fair_share.c b/drivers/thermal/fair_share.c
> index 5d3a7a3..792479f 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/fair_share.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/fair_share.c
> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static long get_target_state(struct
> thermal_zone_device *tz,
>   *	(Heavily assumes the trip points are in ascending order)
>   * new_state of cooling device = P3 * P2 * P1
>   */
> -int fair_share_throttle(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
> +static int fair_share_throttle(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
>  {
>  	const struct thermal_zone_params *tzp;
>  	struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ int fair_share_throttle(struct thermal_zone_device
> *tz, int trip)
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> -struct thermal_governor thermal_gov_fair_share = {
> +static struct thermal_governor thermal_gov_fair_share = {
>  	.name		= "fair_share",
>  	.throttle	= fair_share_throttle,
>  	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
> --
> 1.7.4.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/