linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Work around old gas bug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 27 Sep 2012 06:12:33 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Tao Guo <glorioustao@...il.com>
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Work around old gas bug


* Tao Guo <glorioustao@...il.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 04:28:22AM -0400, Tao Guo wrote:
> >> gas in binutils(2.16.91) could not parse parentheses within macro
> >> parameters unless fully parenthesized, and this is a workaround to
> >> make old gas work without generating below errors:
> >> arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S: Assembler messages:
> >> arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:387: Error: too many positional arguments
> >> arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:389: Error: too many positional arguments
> >> arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:390: Error: too many positional arguments
> >> arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:391: Error: too many positional arguments
> >> arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:392: Error: too many positional arguments
> >> arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:393: Error: too many positional arguments
> >> arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:394: Error: too many positional arguments
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tao Guo <glorioustao@...il.com>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/x86/include/asm/calling.h |   48 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> >>  arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S     |   20 ++++++++--------
> >>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> >
> > <formletter>
> >
> > This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
> > stable kernel tree.  Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
> > for how to do this properly.
> >
> > </formletter>
> 
> Thanks Greg, I just realized that I followed the old rules in 
> an old Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt file. Since the 
> patches for other stable branches will be a little different 
> from this one, I will send them later to 
> stable@...r.kernel.org after this patch gets accepted.

Please don't send this to -stale yet (or at all).

I have queued up the patch for v3.7, not even for v3.6. It needs 
more testing - old GAS users are probably better off having a 
non-building kernel than a subtly broken one. v3.7 and onwards 
stable kernels will have the fix - hopefully by the time it's 
released any more subtle bugs are found and fixed.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/