lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:11:59 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
Cc:	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Subject: Re: CMA broken in next-20120926

On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:29:11 +0200
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de> wrote:

> Hi Marek,
> 
> any idea why CMA might be broken in next-20120926. I see that there
> haven't been any major changes to CMA itself, but there's been quite a
> bit of restructuring of various memory allocation bits lately. I wasn't
> able to track the problem down, though.
> 
> What I see is this during boot (with CMA_DEBUG enabled):
> 
> [    0.266904] cma: dma_alloc_from_contiguous(cma db474f80, count 64, align 6)
> [    0.284469] cma: dma_alloc_from_contiguous(): memory range at c09d7000 is busy, retrying
> [    0.293648] cma: dma_alloc_from_contiguous(): memory range at c09d7800 is busy, retrying
> ...
> [    2.648619] DMA: failed to allocate 256 KiB pool for atomic coherent allocation
> ...
> [    4.196193] WARNING: at /home/thierry.reding/src/kernel/linux-ipmp.git/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c:485 __alloc_from_pool+0xdc/0x110()
> [    4.207988] coherent pool not initialised!
> 
> So the pool isn't getting initialized properly because CMA can't get at
> the memory. Do you have any hints as to what might be going on? If it's
> any help, I started seeing this with next-20120926 and it is in today's
> next as well.
> 

Bart and Minchan have made recent changes to CMA.  Let us cc them.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ