linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/31] perf, kvm: Support the intx/intx_cp modifiers in KVM arch perfmon emulation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 3 Oct 2012 05:11:32 -0700
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	acme@...hat.com, x86@...r.kernel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
	jolsa@...hat.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/31] perf, kvm: Support the intx/intx_cp modifiers in
 KVM arch perfmon emulation

> > -			eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_INT);
> > +			eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_INT,
> > +			!!(eventsel & HSW_INTX),
> > +			!!(eventsel & HSW_INTX_CHECKPOINTED));
> >  }
> >  
> 
> Those !! are !necessary, since the formal argument is a bool.

bool is 1 or 0, x & y with y > 1 is not 1 or 0.
iirc assigning > 1 to bool is undefined

So I think they are necessary.

Or did I misundersand you?

-Andi

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/