linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/13] x86, mm: Revert back good

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 05 Oct 2012 18:02:19 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	ebiederm@...ssion.com
CC:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] x86, mm: Revert back good_end setting for 64bit

That disappeared 10 years ago...

ebiederm@...ssion.com wrote:

>"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> writes:
>
>> On 10/05/2012 02:41 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> with bzImage or vmlinux?
>>>
>>> bzImage I presume.  Certainly the bzImage has lost it's 896M limit,
>>> which is where ultimiately the 896M limite came from.
>>>
>>
>> ~896M (actually comes from i386, not from bzImage...
>
>Right it was 1G - VMALLLOC_SIZE.
>
>At some point that affected the boot protocol as the maximum address we
>could load ramdisks.
>
>Eric

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/